威瑞信(Verisign).com 域名註冊局消費者集體訴訟
威瑞信(Verisign).com 域名注册局消费者集体诉讼
威瑞信(Verisign).com 域名註冊局涉及一宗消費者集體訴訟。頁面內容未載列訴訟指控、進展或其他案件細節。
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information that you’ve provided to them or that they’ve collected from your use of their services. For more information, view our Privacy Policy or Cookie Declaration. Request access to your data through the Data Access Requestpage.
[#GPC_BANNER_ICON#]
[#GPC_TOAST_TEXT#]
Consent Selection
Necessary
- [x]
Preferences
- [x]
Statistics
- [x]
Marketing
- [x]
Details
Necessary 1- [x] Necessary cookies help make a website usable by enabling basic functions like page navigation and access to secure areas of the website. The website cannot function properly without these cookies.
* [Cookiebot 1](https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/verisign-com-domain-name-registry-consumer-class-action#)[Learn more about this provider](https://www.cookiebot.com/goto/privacy-policy/ "Learn more about this provider Cookiebot's privacy policy - opens in a new window")**CookieConsent**Stores the user's cookie consent state for the current domain**Maximum Storage Duration**: 1 year**Type**: HTTP Cookie
Preferences 0- [x] Preference cookies enable a website to remember information that changes the way the website behaves or looks, like your preferred language or the region that you are in.
* We do not use cookies of this type.
Statistics 3- [x] Statistic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
* [Google 2](https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/verisign-com-domain-name-registry-consumer-class-action#)[Learn more about this provider](https://business.safety.google/privacy/ "Learn more about this provider Google's privacy policy - opens in a new window")Some of the data collected by this provider is for the purposes of personalization and measuring advertising effectiveness. The provider may use the IP Addresses for ads measurement and ads personalization.
_gaUsed to send data to Google Analytics about the visitor's device and behavior. Tracks the visitor across devices and marketing channels.Maximum Storage Duration: 2 yearsType: HTTP Cookie ga#Used to send data to Google Analytics about the visitor's device and behavior. Tracks the visitor across devices and marketing channels.Maximum Storage Duration: 2 yearsType: HTTP Cookie
* JotForm 1Learn more about this providerguestRegisters data on visitors' website-behaviour. This is used for internal analysis and website optimization. Maximum Storage Duration: 1 monthType: HTTP Cookie
Marketing 6- [x] Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
* [Meta Platforms, Inc.3](https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/verisign-com-domain-name-registry-consumer-class-action#)[Learn more about this provider](https://www.facebook.com/policy.php/ "Learn more about this provider Meta Platforms, Inc.'s privacy policy - opens in a new window")**lastExternalReferrer**Detects how the user reached the website by registering their last URL-address.**Maximum Storage Duration**: Persistent**Type**: HTML Local Storage **lastExternalReferrerTime**Detects how the user reached the website by registering their last URL-address.**Maximum Storage Duration**: Persistent**Type**: HTML Local Storage **_fbp**Used by Facebook to deliver a series of advertisement products such as real time bidding from third party advertisers.**Maximum Storage Duration**: 3 months**Type**: HTTP Cookie
* [JotForm 1](https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/verisign-com-domain-name-registry-consumer-class-action#)[Learn more about this provider](https://www.jotform.com/privacy/ "Learn more about this provider JotForm's privacy policy - opens in a new window")**userReferer**Determines how the user accessed the website. This information is used by the website operator in order to measure the efficiency of their marketing. **Maximum Storage Duration**: 1 month**Type**: HTTP Cookie
* [Reddit 2](https://www.hbsslaw.com/cases/verisign-com-domain-name-registry-consumer-class-action#)[Learn more about this provider](https://www.redditinc.com/policies/privacy-policy "Learn more about this provider Reddit's privacy policy - opens in a new window")**_rdt_uuid[x2]**Used to track visitors on multiple websites, in order to present relevant advertisement based on the visitor's preferences. **Maximum Storage Duration**: 3 months**Type**: HTTP Cookie
Unclassified 1 Unclassified cookies are cookies that we are in the process of classifying, together with the providers of individual cookies.
- Reddit 1Learn more about this provider_rdt_cfgPendingMaximum Storage Duration: SessionType: HTML Local Storage
Cross-domain consent[#BULK_CONSENT_DOMAINS_COUNT#]
[#BULK_CONSENT_TITLE#]
List of domains your consent applies to: [#BULK_CONSENT_DOMAINS#]
Cookie declaration last updated on 10/19/26 by Cookiebot
[#IABV2_TITLE#]
[#IABV2_BODY_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_LEGITIMATE_INTEREST_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PREFERENCE_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_LABEL_PURPOSES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PURPOSES#]
[#IABV2_LABEL_FEATURES#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_FEATURES#]
[#IABV2_LABEL_PARTNERS#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS_INTRO#]
[#IABV2_BODY_PARTNERS#]
About
Cookies are small text files that can be used by websites to make a user's experience more efficient.
The law states that we can store cookies on your device if they are strictly necessary for the operation of this site. For all other types of cookies we need your permission.
This site uses different types of cookies. Some cookies are placed by third party services that appear on our pages.
Learn more about who we are, how you can contact us and how we process personal data in our Privacy Policy.
Please state your consent ID and date when you contact us regarding your consent.
- [x]
Do not sell or share my personal information
Deny Allow selection Customize Allow all
[](https://www.hbsslaw.com/search)
Main navigation
-
- Anti-Terrorism
- Antitrust Litigation
- Automotive Litigation
- Child Sexual Abuse
- Civil & Human Rights Litigation
- Class Action Litigation
- Consumer Rights
- Data Breach, Privacy & Cybersecurity
- Emissions Litigation
- Employment Litigation
- Environmental Litigation
- First Responder Litigation
- Governmental Representation
- High Tech Litigation
- Intellectual Property
- Investor Fraud
- Personal Injury Litigation
- Pharmaceutical Fraud
- Sexual Abuse & Harassment
- Sports Litigation
- Veterans & Military Servicemember Litigation
- Whistleblower
-
- Anti-Terrorism
- Antitrust Litigation
- Automotive Litigation
- Child Sexual Abuse
- Civil & Human Rights Litigation
- Class Action Litigation
- Consumer Rights
- Data Breach, Privacy & Cybersecurity
- Emissions Litigation
- Employment Litigation
- Environmental Litigation
- First Responder Litigation
- Governmental Representation
- High Tech Litigation
- Intellectual Property
- Investor Fraud
- Personal Injury Litigation
- Pharmaceutical Fraud
- Sexual Abuse & Harassment
- Sports Litigation
- Veterans & Military Servicemember Litigation
- Whistleblower
Verisign .com Domain Name Registry Consumer Class Action
Do you own a .com domain name? Verisign, the sole operator of the .com registry, may have overcharged consumers through an illegal monopoly. If you purchased a .com domain name since 2022, contact us today »
Case Status
Active
Case Caption
Kessler v. VeriSign, Inc. et al.
Attorneys
Practice Areas
Court
U.S. District Court Central District of California
Judge Assigned
Hon. Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr
Case Number
2:26-cv-09960
Defendant(S)
VeriSign, Inc.
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”)
File Date
09/04/2026
Phone
Related Documents
- Complaint 09/04/26
WHAT'S THE ISSUE?
Hagens Berman has filed a class-action lawsuit against Verisign Inc. and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for allegedly maintaining anillegal monopoly over .com domain names— the most widely used domain name extension, with over160 millionactive registrations worldwide.Verisign is the sole operator of the .com registry, the authoritative database that makes every .com website and email address work.**There is no alternative supplier.**Consumers have no choice but to pay Verisign's price — no exceptions.
ALLEGATIONS AGAINST VERISIGN AND ICANN
The lawsuit alleges that Verisign’s prices are the result of a contract between it and ICANN that entitles Verisign to a permanent monopoly over the .com registry, and that ICANN, the organization originally intended to promote competition for .com, now shares in Verisign’s monopoly profits. Since 2021, Verisign’s price has risen more than 30%, from $7.85 to $10.26 per domain, even as the actual cost of providing registry services has fallen in the industry. Verisign’s financial filings indicate it costs Verisign approximately $3 per domain to operate.com domains, and comparable registries around the world charge an average of between $5 and $6. Verisign charges roughly double that amount, generating operating margins of more than 67%— higher than Apple, Microsoft or Alphabet, as cited in the lawsuit. In 2025 alone, Verisign returned**$1 billion**to shareholders through stock buybacks and dividends, which attorneys allege is funded not by innovation, but by fees extracted from a captive customer base.
ANTITRUST CLAIMS
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has already recognized that similar antitrust claims against Verisign and ICANN over the .com registry are legally viable.The National Telecommunications and Information Administration has expressly stated that “a reduction in .com prices would be in the best interest of the public." Andbipartisan members of Congress have called for an antitrust investigation, warning that Verisign's**"monopolistic elements and excessive domain name price increases**stifle the ability of potential .com registrants to conduct business online." Senator Elizabeth Warren and Representative Jerrold Nadler have separately warned that “Verisign is ripping off the owners of 150 million .com websites by charging over $10 annually for each .com registration, making over $1 billion with its predatory pricing scheme that the Company then uses to pad its shareholders’ pockets.”
WHO IS AFFECTED?
You may be affected if you:
- Registered or renewed a .com domain name since 2022
- Are a small business owner, nonprofit, or individual who maintains a .com website or email address
- Paid to register a .com domain name through any registrar, including GoDaddy, Namecheap, Cloudflare, Google Domains/Squarespace, Network Solutions, Porkbun or any other provider
Every .com registrant pays Verisign's fee. It is embedded in every transaction, at every registrar, without exception.If you registered a .com domain name for personal or business use since 2022,contact us today.
HOW THE ALLEGED .COM MONOPOLY WORKS
Every .com domain registration or renewal passes through a two-tier system. Verisign operates the registry, or the wholesale layer, and thousands of registrars (companies like GoDaddy, Namecheap and Cloudflare) compete at the retail level to sell domains to consumers, the lawsuit states. Butevery registrar must pay Verisign the same non-negotiable wholesale feefor every .com domain registered, according to the filing. That fee is embedded in the price consumers pay, regardless of which registrar is used.
There is no other supplier.Verisign has a 100% share of the .com registry marketand a contractual right to keep it — indefinitely — through a "presumptive right of renewal" that forecloses competitive bidding, according to the lawsuit.
WHY PRICES KEEP RISING
Verisign obtained its alleged permanent monopoly througha years-long campaign of coercion against ICANN— the private nonprofit that oversees the domain name system — the lawsuit states. Attorneys allege that through vexatious litigation, attacks on ICANN's credibility, financial threats and intimidation of ICANN,**Verisign dismantled the competitive safeguards that originally governed the .com registry.**It eliminated competitive bidding, obtained perpetual renewal rights, and then leveraged that entrenched position to extract ever-higher prices, according to the lawsuit.
Since 2006, Verisign has raised prices to the maximum permitted amount in every single yearit has been allowed to, and ICANN has continued to renew Verisign’s contract — receiving increased payments with its renewals. Under the current agreement, prices are projected to reach approximately $13.44 by 2030.
Meanwhile, real-world data shows registry costs are moving sharply in the opposite direction. Public Interest Registry, the nonprofit that operates .org, achieved a 70% reduction in backend registry costs over the past decade — through competitive bidding. While those costs fell more than 70%,**Verisign raised its prices more than 30%.**Attorneys say this divergence is the signature of a monopoly unchecked by competition.
HOW CAN A CLASS-ACTION LAWSUIT HELP?
**A class-action lawsuit allows the millions of individuals and businesses who pay Verisign's inflated fees to collectively seek accountability.**A successful action could result in damages, a rollback of supra-competitive pricing, and an order requiring competitive bidding for the .com registry — the same mechanism that has driven costs down for every other major top-level domain.
TOP CONSUMER RIGHTS LAW FIRM
Hagens Berman is one of the most prominent plaintiffs’ litigation law firms in the U.S. and has achieved total settlements valued at more than $345 billion for classes and clients in lawsuits across its practice areas. The firmsuccessfully pursued antitrust claims against Apple, securing a settlement valued at $568 millionon behalf of e-book purchasers and asettlement valued at $100 millionon behalf of iOS app developers. If you have a claim, it will be handled by attorneys with deep experience taking on the technology industry in antitrust litigation.
NO COST TO YOU
**In no case will any class member ever be asked to pay any out-of-pocket sum.**In the event Hagens Berman or any other firm obtains a settlement that provides benefits to class members, the court will decide a reasonable fee to be awarded to the legal team for the class.
CASE TIMELINE
2026
Sep 4
Complaint Filed
Hagens Berman purchases advertisements on search engines, social media sites and other websites. Transmission of the information contained or available through this website is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Hagens Berman agrees to protect transmitted information in accordance with our Privacy Policy.This website is informational, not legal advice.If you seek legal advice or representation by Hagens Berman, you must first enter a formal agreement. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.This site includes attorney advertising and is regulated by the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Download Page as Word File
Press Releases
Sep 4, 2026
RELATED CASES
Previous
Next




































Contact
1-888-381-2889
Practice Areas
Data Breach, Privacy & Cybersecurity
Veterans & Military Servicemember Litigation
The Firm
Copyright © 2026 | All Rights Reserved |Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP Law Firm
Privacy Policy | Terms &Conditions|Disclaimer|Cookie Declaration|Data Access Request
[Change my consent](javascript: Cookiebot.renew()) | [Revoke my consent](javascript: Cookiebot.withdraw()) | Do not sell or share my personal information
Attorney Advertising. This website is informational and does not constitute legal advice.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This site is regulated by the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC).
來源:Hacker News 熱門(buzzing.cc 中文翻譯) · hbsslaw.com