Brainstorm：問題不在 Vibe coding，而在未留下分歧紀錄便發布

I almost shipped a feature that one model loved.

I vibe-coded it in a single tab. It felt clean. Confidence was high.

Then I ran the same brief through a second model. It flagged a silent failure path the first one never mentioned.

That was the real lesson for me as a solo builder:

Vibe coding isn’t the problem. Rubber-stamp confidence is.

What I want before anything leaves my machine:

1. Multiple models answer the same question (BYOK — bring your own keys)
2. They disagree in one room
3. I audit the trail
4. Then I export

I’m building Brainstorm as that shell: debate → audit → export. It does not sell model credits. Linux first. $6/mo.

Site: https://brainstorm.mungwaan.cn

If you already hop between ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini tabs for important decisions, you’re halfway there — the missing piece is a forced disagreement step before you trust the answer.