Claude Code 插件 knowledge-gardener：插件只負責何時操作，vault 決定如何操作——設計不受格式限制的插件

Introduction

My Claude Code plugin knowledge-gardener holds none of the Obsidian vault's formatting conventions (filename / frontmatter / link syntax / folder layout). Instead, it reads the vault's own README.md every time. This post is about why I did that, how it differs from existing plugins, and what properties fall out of it.

There are already several plugins that CRUD an Obsidian vault for Claude Code. Representative examples:

eugeniughelbur/obsidian-second-brain — assumes its own wiki / PARA schema
AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian — fixes the Karpathy wiki pattern
dlutsyk/Obsidian-Zettelkasten-Claude (MCP) — forces Luhmann IDs

These hardcode the format on the plugin side. So if your vault has its own conventions — "standard markdown links (no wikilinks)," "numeric-prefix folders (01_FleetingNotes/ etc.)" — it conflicts outright. You could fork and fix it, but at that point the plugin's generality is gone.

The plugin holds WHEN, the vault holds HOW

knowledge-gardener holds only when to CRUD the vault, and follows the vault's own README for how to write.

[conventional plugin]              [knowledge-gardener]
plugin holds the format too        plugin: when to write / what to write
→ doesn't fit another vault        vault README: how to write
                                   → conventions concentrate in the vault

With this separation of concerns:

Change the conventions on the vault side and the plugin needs no edits
It can absorb format differences in someone else's vault via the README
The plugin's logic can focus on "durable-insight detection / duplicate checking / propose-then-write"

Implementation: read the README in pre-flight

I put a "Pre-flight Setup" at the top of every skill. The shared steps, abridged:

1. Resolve the vault path from the KG_VAULT environment variable
2. Read $KG_VAULT/README.md (the vault-root convention document)
3. Also read $KG_VAULT/../README.md (in case the vault is a repo subdir)
4. If a folder-scoped README exists, consult it too
5. If conventions are unclear, stop and ask — don't silently invent a default

In implementation terms, each operational skill (plant / water / connect / prune / survey / recap) handles its own CRUD action, and they share the common "Pre-flight Setup" to eliminate duplication.

Gotchas

For a vault with no README, "not running" is better. Start writing with silent defaults and you mass-produce notes that don't follow that vault's conventions. Stop-and-ask isn't a limitation — it's a spec to prevent format drift.
The vault README can live in more than one place. My vault has an Obsidian/vault/ structure, so some conventions live in Obsidian/README.md (the parent) and some in vault/README.md (the vault root). Read both, and on conflict prefer the vault root.
Folder-scoped conventions (e.g. a People folder with different frontmatter) get a separate layer that reads a folder-scoped README.

Results

The plugin runs as-is on my vault (numeric-prefix folders + standard markdown links + a custom tag namespace).
The same plugin would, in principle, run on someone else's wiki-style vault or a Luhmann-ID vault as long as they write a README.
The plugin's responsibilities are clear, so adding a new skill (garden-recap, etc.) needs no format-related decisions.

Wrap-up

It's not "the plugin holds the format" but "the vault holds the format, and the plugin reads it."
Separation of concerns: the plugin holds WHEN, the vault holds HOW.
If conventions are unclear, stop — not silently inventing a default is what prevents format drift.

References

This post was written with AI assistance and reviewed by the author.