跳到正文
DEV Community· chilala·· 3 小時前AI 評分31

us-east-1 上 Opus5 與 Opus5.5 的基準測試筆記

Benchmark notes: Opus5 & Opus5.5 on us-east-1

AI 導讀

作者在 us-east-1 對 opus5 和 opus5.5 部署進行負載測試,記錄延遲、節流及部署間吞吐量的差異。短提示詞的單次請求延遲約為 3.0s ~ 4.5s,較長提示詞可達 6s 以上;並發量增加後,429 回應會迅速出現。部分部署另有靜態 401 問題,而同一模型版本在不同預置吞吐量部署上的穩定最高吞吐量差異顯著。

正文

chilala

I’ve been running load tests on opus5 and opus5.5 deployments in us-east-1 and want to share my observations.

Test setup

  • Region: us-east-1
  • Model: opus5, opus5.5
  • Test type: Concurrent chat completions, mixed short and medium-length prompts
  • Auth: Standard AWS Bedrock credential flow

Observations

  1. For short prompts: single-request latency is roughly 3.0s ~ 4.5s. Longer prompts with large output targets can extend to 6s+.
  2. Throttling (429 responses) triggers quickly once concurrency increases. Even with higher baseline TPM/RPM quotas, the opus family is far more sensitive to load compared to older models.
  3. I’ve encountered a separate static 401 issue on some deployments: credentials pass initial auth checks, but opus5/5.5 model access fails, while other standard Bedrock models on the same subscription work normally. This appears unrelated to concurrency pressure.
  4. The stable maximum throughput varies significantly between different provisioned-throughput deployments for the same model version.

Questions
I’m curious if other folks have run similar benchmarks for these models.
What steady throughput and latency are you getting on your working opus5 / opus5.5 deployments?
If you have a stable production deployment for these models, I’d be glad to exchange benchmark data and configuration details via DM.

來源:DEV Community · dev.to