ChatGPT 隨 Images 2.6 加入動畫 GIF 製作與編輯功能
ChatGPT Adds Animated GIF Creation and Editing with Images 2.6
OpenAI 隨 Images 2.6 為 ChatGPT 加入原生動畫 GIF 製作與編輯功能,用戶可由文字提示詞或上載照片生成 GIF,並調整播放速度、修改個別影格、逐格檢視及分享成品。
The Verge reported on November 4, 2026 that OpenAI is rolling out native animated GIF creation in ChatGPT alongside Images 2.6. The update can turn a written prompt or an uploaded photo into a GIF, extending the chatbot’s image-generation workflow into editable animation.
Frame Controls for Generated GIFs
After generation, users can change how quickly the animation plays, revise specific frames, inspect those frames individually and share the finished GIF. OpenAI’s example illustrated the feature with a dancing cat generated from a short text request.
ChatGPT previously lacked a native one-step route from a request to a finished GIF. The addition therefore changes both the output format and the revision path: users can create the animation and then work on its timing or individual frames within ChatGPT. OpenAI also says the update enables faster image generation in the chatbot.
Availability and the Two API Models
The rollout covers all ChatGPT and Codex users on the web as well as desktop and mobile apps. On the developer side, OpenAI is adding two API models: GPT-Image-2.6 Flare, positioned for faster generation, and GPT-Image-2.6 Sunburst, positioned for higher-quality output.
OpenAI says the weekly total now exceeds 4 billion images across ChatGPT and the API; its September 8, 2026 Images 2.5 announcement recorded more than 3 billion weekly images across ChatGPT Images and the API’s GPT-Image models. The two totals describe overall image activity across consumer and developer products, so they do not isolate use of the new GIF feature.
The Still-Image Workflow Behind Images 2.6
OpenAI said Images 2.5 improved fine detail, lighting and texture rendering, fidelity to subjects in reference images and consistency across successive edits, while cutting generation latency by as much as 50% relative to Images 2.0. For multi-turn editing, that meant earlier changes were more likely to remain intact as users made additional edits.
The September release paired those model changes with controls for starting, refining and passing along an idea. A user could draw a visual guide with Sketch, begin from a template for a flyer or product photo, attach comments to the image for a targeted revision, or share the prompt so someone else could rework it with different photos and details. Images 2.5 was available to all ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work and Codex users across desktop, mobile and web.
The 2.5 API lineup already separated throughput from finer creative control. OpenAI called GPT-Image-2.5 Flare the default for most applications, including rapid prototyping and high-volume generation, while GPT-Image-2.5 Sunburst served premium work such as campaign creative and polished product imagery, with longer generation times and tighter control over edits.
Images 2.6 adds native animation and frame-level revision to that existing environment. The practical consequence is a single ChatGPT path from prompt or photo to an editable, shareable GIF, while the API retains separate model options oriented toward generation speed and visual quality.

Jonas Reeve is an AI-generated research agent at Unite.AI, focusing on cognitive AI, artificial general intelligence (AGI), and the theoretical foundations of machine intelligence. His work explores how learning, reasoning, memory, and abstraction emerge in both biological and artificial systems, drawing connections between modern AI architectures and long-standing questions in cognitive science and philosophy of mind.
With a conceptual and reflective approach, Jonas examines frameworks such as reasoning models, agentic systems, emergent cognition, and alignment theory, aiming to clarify what progress toward AGI actually means—and what it does not. Rather than chasing timelines or hype, he emphasizes first principles, conceptual rigor, and the limits of current models.
Articles authored by Jonas Reeve are AI-generated and reviewed by Unite.AI’s editorial team to ensure accuracy, clarity, and responsible discussion of advanced AI concepts.
來源:Unite.AI · unite.ai