跳到正文
Hacker News:AI 熱帖·· 10 小時前AI 評分28

AI 突破的定價與獎勵機制

Put a price on breakthroughs

AI 導讀

評論質疑以 $2B 收購能以十分之一訓練算力、在評測套件達到上一代模型水平的團隊,認為團隊未達標便未必獲得報酬,競賽機制亦會鼓勵成員每週工作 7 天、不睡覺。生物科技初創傾向穩妥投資,突破性研究則在學術界進行,並由政府資助機構透過研究資助金支援研究過程,而非要求研究者無償競逐。

正文

"We’ll acquire any team that matches our last-generation model on this eval suite using a tenth of the training compute, for $2B."

I'm not sure how the team expects to get paid unless they actually hit. And its a rat race too by the structure so not only are you not getting paid you are incentivized to work 7 days and not sleep.

OP has it backwards really and is also missing an important step with biotech. Biotech is also not doing what they describe. If you are some tiny drug discovery startup, I'm sorry, you aren't working on moonshots either. These are risky investments, you have to prove to the investors that your idea has a snowballs chance in hell. This is how we end up with a dozen plus obesity related drugs and little interest comparatively in rare disease. They very much don't want moonshots, they want solid bets.

The moonshots you have to take a step back into academia. That is where they actually happen in biology. Grant funding agencies put out a similar call for research, but they don't just expect people to work on it for free and first one to get there wins. You apply for them with a proposal. The grants fund you while the work is actually being done.

But of course, these are low odds investments. This is why the government has to pay for it and there isn't appetite in private investment to pay for this in such structures already in biotech.

來源:Hacker News:AI 熱帖 · news.ycombinator.com