跳到正文
Hacker News:AI 熱帖·· 4 小時前AI 評分31

Show HN:免費、開源、完全本機運作並加入 AI 的 Adobe Lightroom 替代品

Show HN: Free open source Adobe Lightroom alternative, completely local with AI

AI 導讀

開發者在 Hacker News 展示一款免費、開源、完全本機運作並加入 AI 的 Adobe Lightroom 替代品。開發者表示,軟件以 C++ 編寫,工作流程受 Darktable 啟發,但沒有複製其程式碼,設計目標是較 Darktable 更易上手。

正文
Show HN: Free open source Adobe Lightroom alternative, completely local with AI (github.com/thesnarkitecht)
26 points by thesnarkitecht 1 hour ago | hide | past | favorite | 21 comments

If you copy the url at the top and resolve it, it downloads the bin. But i think this may be a false alarm and the botnet just spread his malware over github.


I love trying out new software, but with Github getting blasted all the time, supply chain compromise, and now in the vibe coding era with people not even checking, we have to be careful. It sucks that this is the status quo now.


What advantages does this offer over Darktable, the long standing FOSS lightroom alternative?

Edit: One criticism of Darktable is that it emphasizes its "scene-referred workflow" as opposed to a "display-referred workflow" like Lightroom does, making it not a true Lightroom alternative. Seems like this also happens to be written in C++ and also uses a scene-referred workflow? Quite the coincidence. How much of the important design decisions (or implementation) are just copied from Darktable?


Darktable is GPL-3.0 licensed, meaning that I would have to attribute Darktable if it was used in the project. I chose C++ because it is extremely fast. I built this because I was frustrated that Darktable had such a high learning curve. No code was copied from Darktable with my knowledge. As for your comments about the workflow, I will look into that and make sure that this project gives credit where credit is due. Thanks for your feedback.

Note after a quick question to Claude: The workflow is inspired by Darktable, but none of its code was copied. This project aims at approachability versus darktable's many features.


This is unfortunately exactly the kind of project I wouldn't want to trust my photo management workflow to...software is cheaper than ever, thoughtful maintenance and longevity is worth much more to me.

Not that Adobe's getting my money either.


It's got the kind of UI that I would love pre-2024 or so but these days it just screams "AI generic" unfortunately. Documentation is fairy concise and reasonably LLM-jargon free though.


Given that some are now reversing all closed software using LLMs, it should be now finally worth reversing the whole of Nvidia’s closed source software, drivers and blobs, including CUDA.

No excuses this time.


I think they're not reversing the way you may think(and they're doing a very bad job, if you try any of these apps they collapse very soon for basic workflow things) but rather copying the behaviour by looking at input and output. A clean-room design is called iirc


There's Asahi Linux, why arent they doing it already? Imo the end result is not great and it's very hard to maintain. Like Asahi has already demonstrated


perhaps my requirements aren’t that complex but i find Affinity mostly a great replacement for InDesign. there are some annoyances and unintuitive limitations but its all workable.

來源:Hacker News:AI 熱帖 · news.ycombinator.com